Global Media Project group shot
Global Media Seminar with James Der Derian, John Santos, and chihuahuas

Global Media Project group shot
The 2007 Global Media class prepares for its psycho-geographic drift to the Providence Mall to see The 300

Global Media Project group shot
John Phillip Santos, James Der Derian and Eugene Jarecki with the inaugural 2006 Global Media class (and Che T-shirts)

« This is War: Memories of Iraq | Main | Virtualization and The “Reel” »

Behind Military Analysts, the Pentagon’s Hidden Hand

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/20/washington/20generals.html?_r=1&hp=&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1208700696-yNdmtBfygcUfPpUSu6sjAQ

This article from today's NY Times talks about the Pentagon's deliberate shaping of public opinion in favor of their military actions, through the "expert commentary" on TV of retired generals...here is an excerpt:

"Hidden behind that appearance of objectivity, though, is a Pentagon information apparatus that has used those analysts in a campaign to generate favorable news coverage of the administration’s wartime performance, an examination by The New York Times has found.
The effort, which began with the buildup to the Iraq war and continues to this day, has sought to exploit ideological and military allegiances, and also a powerful financial dynamic: Most of the analysts have ties to military contractors vested in the very war policies they are asked to assess on air."

Comments

So it turns out that our wartime messengers have been demagogues. This is a great article by the Times as was a recent feature about the mimetic info war for hearts and minds between Al Queda and the Pentagon http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/04/world/asia/04qaeda.html?th&emc=th
But I think that we should also question these messages coming from the Times: Aren't these revelations coming a little bit too late, and could this be an effort to re-establish their authority in a war of networks, which they both failed to recognize and continue to participate in?

So it turns out that our wartime messengers have been demagogues. This is a great article by the Times as was a recent feature about the mimetic info war for hearts and minds between Al Queda and the Pentagon http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/04/world/asia/04qaeda.html?th&emc=th
But I think that we should also question these messages coming from the Times: Aren't these revelations coming a little bit too late, and could this be an effort to re-establish their authority in a war of networks, which they both failed to recognize and continue to participate in?

Nice catch Julia. It's always great to see the NYTIMES catch up to our class...

VTY
JDD

A WATSONBLOG, hosted by THE WATSON INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES at BROWN UNIVERSITY