Recent Posts:
- International PB Conference - Registration Open!
- 2012 PB Conference Updates
- Los Angeles PB Event - Jan 12th
- New Orleans event
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- December 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- January 2009
- November 2008
- August 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
Search Site
Participatory PB Evaluation in Toronto
Toronto Community Housing, the second largest housing authority in North America, has been practicing participatory budgeting since 2001. Each year, tenants decide how to allocate roughly $9 million in capital funds. In April 2009, we launched a 2-year participatory evaluation of the PB process. The purpose of the evaluation was to help tenants and staff better understand how the PB works, in order to identify and agree on improvements.
Together with 25 tenants, we evaluated each phase of the process, including local building meetings, delegate preparation, allocation days, and monitoring. The evaluation began with a series of capacity-building and planning workshops with tenant researchers, in which the tenants helped design the evaluation methodology and developed research skills. We then accompanied the tenants in observing meetings, designing survey questions, interviewing fellow tenants and staff, analyzing research findings, and developing recommendations.
Each year, we facilitated two final participatory workshops, in which a cross-section of tenants and staff reviewed a draft evaluation report and reached agreement on recommended changes for the next year's PB process. The final findings and recommendations from the two years of evaluation are presented in the following reports:
- 2009 Evaluation Report
- 2010 Evaluation Report
Evelyn Murialdo (former director of Toronto Community Housing's Community Health Unit): "We decided to do the participatory evaluation because we need to make a business case for the PB. We need to make sure that what we do has clear ways of being measured. We tried to do evaluations before, but this has taken us further into anchoring it in the voices of tenants. The more you give voice to tenants, the bigger the choir is going to be, and the bigger the impact."
Magdalena Palma (tenant researcher): "I liked how the facilitators explained things to us, how they got us to work and deliberate. They gave all of us the opportunity to participate... The evaluation is useful for real growth and learning, to build up good bases in the community."
For more information on PB at Toronto Community Housing see:
Participatory Budgeting in New York
The PB Project is proud to serve as the lead technical assistance partner for a new $6 million PB process in four New York City Council districts.


| Services |
|
Public Education |
|
Technical Assistance |
|
Research & Evaluation |
